For humanity – against division. Opposing the far right Gloucester hotel protest

Why we’re standing with people seeking asylum living at the Ibis hotel in Gloucester. The article below was written ahead of a counter-protest against a far right protest outside the hotel on Saturday 30th August, which has been organised by a violent racist. We have since learned the “Patriots of Gloucestershire” are planning a further protest against people seeking asylum on October 5th – there will be another counter-protest, details to follow.

See details of the counter-protest at the end of this article or on our webpage here.

2,800 words – appproximately 15 minute read.

Content Warning: racism, sexual violence, child sexual exploitation

Tough times and a bleak future

We live in times of huge uncertainty, regularly receiving awful news about things happening in this country and around the world. It’s often hard to see the future as anything other than bleak. Everything is costing more and more, so many of us are overloaded, underpaid and disrespected at work – and public services are falling apart after decades of underfunding. There are long waiting lists for NHS treatment, you get put in endless queues any time you ring for any kind of support, and everywhere we turn there’s endless forms or some annoying digital process you have to navigate in order to be able to … well, live. Town centres are full of empty shops and homelessness is at an all time time – and no wonder when rents and house prices are completely ridiculous. In so many places around the country it feels like any sense of community is being broken, or has been long lost. And violence against women is terrifyingly common. Every week there are women who are killed by a partner or ex-partner, and one in four women experience domestic violence in their lifetime – that’s us, our family members, our friends, neighbours, and people we work with. It is hard to think of anything more horrific than the sexual abuse of children, and understandably it is a crime that incites a lot of anger within our communities. But again, if we don’t have direct experience ourselves, we will all know people who have – whether we know of their experiences or not.

We all adapt to living in this messed up world in different ways – we all do what we have to do to make it through. One thing that is hard to watch is how people respond to the mess of the world by adding to the hatred, division and nastiness themselves.

Scapegoating

We’ve seen in the past how, when things get especially bad – like in the Great Depression of the 1930s for example – cruel and ruthless leaders prey on people’s fears and manipulate and channel them into hatred of people who have nothing to do with the problems that actually face people. This is called ‘scapegoating’. It’s what the Nazis did in Germany – blaming the economic problems in the country following WW1 and the reaction to it by the victors of that war and blaming them on Jews, migrants, LGBTQ+ people, disabled people, their political opponents and… well… anyone except the people actually responsible.

We’re seeing the same thing play out today – a whole cast of characters spending their entire time turning whole groups of innocent people into the “other”, making them less than human, making them our “enemies”. Maybe you’ve noticed how it seems like the targets change week to week, or that the targets seem to be chosen almost at random… and that’s because they are. The people who peddle hatred are just throwing mud at a wall and seeing what sticks – what their audience will latch onto, what gets the most clicks or engagement online, what will make people angry, what will generate its own momentum…  what the mainstream media or the Prime Minister will join in with.

And if one peddler of hate gets some success targeting a particular group of people? Well then the others will all join the chase. When you think about it, it’s incredibly lazy. What’s frustrating is how these grifters and hate mongers are somehow able to speak to all the anger we feel about poverty and the cost of living, our societies and environment being destroyed and politicians promising change and then delivering mostly just more of the same… they take that righteous anger and redirect it onto other working class people, and away from the billionaires who are hoovering up all the wealth and the systems that sustain inequality and injustice. In 2024 alone, “UK billionaires saw their collective wealth increase last year by £35 million ($44m) a day to £182 billion ($231bn)”. Instead of talking about how we could better distribute the wealth we all produce, we get rich white men funded by even richer white men telling us that “climate change isn’t real”, but people fleeing war are a “threat to civilisation”. 

For a while the focus was on disabled people, then we’ve had a whole panic about trans people, and right now it’s back to that familiar target of hatred – “asylum seekers”. Whether its Nigel Farage, Tommy Robinson, or local figure Rone Taylor (more on him in a second), the arguments are just reheated versions of the same nonsense we’ve heard since the early 2000s (when papers like The Sun and Daily Mail kept trying to attach the word “bogus” to the term “asylum seeker” in a a desperate attempt to convince us all not to have compassion for people feeling war and persecution). As ever, those pushing hatred will claim they aren’t racist, they just have “legitimate concerns” that for some reason always single out people from other countries as the problem, rather than the actual causes. As if there haven’t been around 700,000 empty homes in Britain since 2012, and as if high rents aren’t the result of profiteering by landlords, developers, banks and a whole system that treats housing as a source of wealth rather than a basic need.

Protecting women and girls

This time around there’s a particular focus on “protecting women and girls”. Who doesn’t agree we should do that? It just comes as a bit of a shock to learn that the people who’ve been attacking feminism, praising the likes of Andrew Tate as he faces rape and trafficking charges, or defending Donald Trump… are suddenly concerned with women’s safety.

There’s a long and grim history of white men pushing racism by claiming whole other groups of people are a threat to women and girls, but we saw a particularly stark example of this last year. When Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe and Alice da Silva Aguiar were killed in Southport, with other children wounded and traumatised when attacked attending a Taylor Swift themed dance workshop, most people responded with horror and support for the people, families and communities affected. But the hate merchants and far right organisations had other ideas.

“In August 2024, six days of racist rioting spread across UK cities. Asylum seeker centres were fire bombed, Black and Brown people were subject to pogroms, pulled out their cars and attacked on the streets. It was multi-racial communities, coming out in unity and self-defence, that put an end to the violence – not the police or politicians.” (Black Lives Matter UK)

But though the attacker was Black, he was not an “asylum seeker” – nor was he representative of all Black people. There is no evidence to suggest that people seeking asylum are disproportionately sexual offenders or violent criminals. People seeking asylum are human beings, and some human beings do horrible things. We don’t need to pretend all people seeking asylum or all Black people are perfect, but it absolutely is bigoted prejudice to suggest that every person applying for asylum and placed in a hotel by the Home Office is inevitably criminal, or more of a threat to women and girls than anyone else.

And while it’s true that not everyone who attends a protest outside a hotel is a long-term member of a far-right organisation, or a violent racist, it’s revealing to look at who is involved in these protests and riots, and who is involved in organising them.

Rone Taylor – organiser of the Gloucester hotel protest REVEALED

Let’s start with “Rone Taylor”, who appears to be the main organiser of a protest outside the Ibis hotel in Gloucester, where people seeking asylum are living.

On the 18th August, Rone posted that this protest was “upcoming” and prominent in his advert is “PROTECT OUR CHILDREN!!” His name on Facebook now is “Rone Taylor”, but he is quite open that this is a new name adopted since his previous account under his full name “Byron Glyn Taylor” was disabled for breaching Facebook’s Community Standards. We understand this was related to being reported for racist comments, and nothing to do with the Online Safety Act.

In 2020, Byron was jailed for 18 months for physically attacking and racially abusing schoolchildren, while in his mid-late twenties. He “pleaded guilty to the racially aggravated assault of a teenage girl by beating her and damaging her property on May 2, 2019. He also admitted assaulting two other teenagers by beating on the same date.” He had followed three schoolchildren, “shouted some racial comments at them and made derogatory comments about their dreadlocks”, before swinging a punch at a girl with a closed fist. “He later swung his fist at a female pupil and assaulted a male pupil with a punch to the victim’s head. Taylor then turned his attention to the first girl and punched her again.” Is this someone you can believe is holding a protest outside a hotel housing people seeking asylum because he wants to “protect children”? Is it more likely it is because of racism, however hard he tries to deny it?

This wasn’t the first time Taylor was convicted of a crime and sent to prison. In 2012 he was sentenced to 6 months for falsely accusing 3 innocent people of rioting (including two members of his own family). Not only has Tayler had his Facebook pages taken down in the last few months, he also informs his followers that the Police and the Prevent programme made him take down his YouTube channel. His TikTok account has gone the same way as the YouTube channel and his Facebook account. Rone Taylor claims to be a peaceful Christian patriot. In fact he is a racist criminal who assaulted children. Can you trust what he says?

Are the far right really interested in protecting women?

“Rone Taylor” isn’t the only example of someone who has claimed to be prioritising protecting women and children to disguise their racism. 899 people were arrested for taking part in violent disorder in the August 2024 riots. Two in every five of these people arrested (41%) “had been previously reported to the police for domestic abuse… Previous offences include actual bodily harm, grievous bodily harm, stalking, breach of restraint and non-molestation orders, controlling coercive behaviour and criminal damage.”

We’ve had decades of the far right trying to focus on “Asian grooming gangs” to justify hate, bigotry, and violence towards people of colour. These grooming gangs exist and are appalling, but somehow the existence of grooming gangs made up of white people seems to draw far less attention. When Police officers themselves have been implicated in the Rotherham grooming gangs scandal, with five victims also accusing three police officers of raping them, this horrifying aspect has been treated as less important, or ignored altogether. As Hope Not Hate say, “There have clearly been major systemic failings. Whether it is Telford, Rotherham or Rochdale children have been let down by police, councils, social services and the wider community. We must put justice for survivors first, as we oppose [Tommy Robinson’s] racist opportunism.”

Tommy Robinson” (real name Stephen Yaxley Lennon) has – through the “English Defence League” he founded, other far right organisations and his own platform – been one of the main hate mongers pushing hate against people seeking asylum, migrants, and Muslims – and claiming it is because of an interest in protecting women and girls. But his campaigns are opportunistic, driven by racism – and hypocritical in 2022, Hope Not Hate reported how there have been at least 20 members and supporters of the EDL “convicted of child sexual exploitation offences. At least 10 of these were active in the EDL while Lennon was still leading it, and at the time of writing they could not find a single condemnation from Lennon.

We know that Bryon Glyn Taylor / Rone Taylor – the organiser of the protest outside the Ibis Hotel, is a fan of Tommy Robinson from an old Facebook profile picture and banner image of an EDL protest. He’s also pictured with Laurence Fox – a man notorious for his misogyny and racism.

Ending sexual violence, standing against hate

As the Institute for Race Relations have written, “Whatever the ethnicity of perpetrators, we need to ask what were the structural conditions in that context that enabled sexual abuse, and understand what obstacles victims face in seeking help and support. Funding for youth services and accessible support spaces that do not stigmatise or criminalise victims would be a start. And if we are serious about dealing with issues of sexual violence within different communities, we must also fight for specialised support services that can address particular cultural and language needs of victims – many organisations on the frontlines providing this kind of support are having to fight for survival. Already many have been shut down.” Funding for refuges has been cut by a quarter since 2010.

And this raises another question about the approach of Rone Taylor and all the far-right groups organising protests outside hotels housing people seeking safety. Why aren’t they protesting against the cuts to support services for victims of sexual violence, with Sisters Uncut? Why aren’t they calling for interventions to reduce the likelihood of people of any ethnicity or background committing sexual offences, like the work of Beyond Equality?

The reality is because they don’t care about sexual violence. They are motivated by racism. Groups seeking an end to violence against women have regularly called out far right tactics. Sadly, “There is a very long history of minority communities being framed as a sexual threat by the far right. Whether it is the centuries old blood libel or the characterisation of Jews as paedophiles before the Second World War, attacking African-Caribbean immigrants as rapists and pimps in the post-war period, and now painting Muslims as groomers, the far right have always sought to racialise sexual violence and child sexual exploitation” (as Hope Not Hate write).

As Black Lives Matter say “The painful reality is that sexual violence occurs across all racial and ethnic groups, and in most cases, it is perpetrated by someone the victim already knows. Yet, rare but sensationalised incidents that fall outside this pattern are often exaggerated and weaponised, fuelling moral panics targeted at particular communities.”

To meaningfully end sexual violence and protect all victims, we desperately need to address the underlying causes of sexual violence – most obviously a culture of patriarchy that makes abuse rife – rather than only taking an interest when the perpetrators are from a certain race or background.

We will stand by people seeking asylum. They are human beings. The nastiness and nonsense that’s being said about people fleeing their countries and travelling to the UK is increasing day by day. To state basic facts: everyone has the right to seek protection in a country other than one they have fled from – that’s all an “asylum seeker” is, and it is a legal human right. No one becomes ‘illegal’ just by lacking immigration documents or taking irregular passage to get to a country in which they claim asylum. People making a claim for asylum cannot work, cannot choose where they live, and receive a pitiful amount of money to live on. Refugees are those who have been granted asylum, once their claim of fleeing persecution, conflict or human rights violations has been proved. We can’t support “genuine refugees” without having a system whereby people apply for asylum. There are around 27 million refugees across the world and the UK takes in some of the lowest numbers in Europe – and is home to only 1% of refugees in the world.

Inhumane plans to spending millions deporting thousands more people seeking asylum – as Reform and the Conservatives are now proposing isn’t going to help anyone living here. Nor is targeting migrants who live outside of their country of origin but aren’t seeking asylum, or people of different skin colours or backgrounds who’ve grown up in this country. Scapegoating asylum seekers, refugees, immigrants, or people from different ethnic backgrounds will not solve any of the problems in this country. Losing our sense of shared humanity will lead to a far worse country for everybody and together we need to stand up to it.

We can fight against sexual violence and against racism at the same time. We can welcome people seeking safety. We can build community solidarity – join us.

decorative

Join us and other groups across Gloucestershire on Saturday 30th August from 12.30pm outside the Ibis Hotel in Gloucester, GL4 3DG

Take a stand in solidarity with people seeking asylum who are being threatened by a far right protest advertised to take place at 2pm at the Ibis Hotel in Gloucester where people seeking asylum are living.

Groups across Gloucestershire are working together to hold a counter protest. We won’t let the far right scapegoat people seeking refuge for the problems in this country – we won’t be divided.

Read our key info on time, location, and protest and security guidance.

Our Community United – oppose the far right in Gloucester

Join us and other groups across Gloucestershire on Saturday 30th August from 12.30pm outside the Ibis Hotel in Gloucester, GL4 3DG

Take a stand in solidarity with people seeking asylum who are being threatened by a far right protest advertised to take place at 2pm at the Ibis Hotel in Gloucester where people seeking asylum are living.

Groups across Gloucestershire are working together to hold a non-confrontational counter protest. We won’t let the far right scapegoat people seeking refuge for the problems in this country – we won’t be divided.

Groups supporting the counter-protest include the Unite Community branch for Bath, Bristol, Gloucestershire and Swindon; Gloucester Trades Council; the South West region of the Public and Commercial Services Union; Unison Local Government branch; Stroud Against Racism; Stroud District Together With Refugees; Forest of Dean Stand Up To Racism, Palestine Solidarity Campaign Stroud District, Na'amod Gloucestershire, The RYSE, Stroud Ceasefire Now Coalition, Stroud District Green Party, Communist Party Gloucestershire, and us at Community Solidarity Stroud District.

Please join us and spread the word!

Key info & guidance

The far right say their protest will start at 2pm, we need as many people as possible to be there plenty of time beforehand – so we are meeting from 12:30pm.

  • The location is a 35 minute walk from Gloucester train/bus station, but there are buses. Bus 8 to Brockworth at 12noon leaves a walk of 17 minutes.
  • Bus 62 at 11.10am Stop C Stroud Merrywalks will connect with Bus 8 to Brockworth.
  • Please ensure you travel to and leave the site with others if at all possible, we do not know what the far right protest will be like but counter-protestors are often targeted for violence. Stay safe – don’t travel alone.
  • Tell people where you are going and what time you expect to be back.
  • Wear ordinary clothing, cover up any campaign clothing and carry any campaign materials in a concealed way. It is best to leave jewellery at home. Please bring appropriate sanitary products if appropriate (it will be difficult to access a toilet)
  • Please bring water and snacks but please do not bring alcoholic drink or drugs
  • Bring medication that you may need (preferably in a prescription bottle) including inhalers if you are asthmatic, and keep a copy of emergency phone numbers and any medical information that someone may need to know
  • Don’t bring anything that you wouldn’t want to get searched by the police or arrested with – including anything that could be interpreted as a weapon such as a banner that requires poles
  • Please leave valuables at home
  • If bringing a phone, make sure it is fully charged. If arrested, the police have the power to take your phone and search it for evidence. Make sure it is locked with a passcode and switch off any facial and fingerprint unlocking technology. You may wish to bring a portable phone charger if you have one.
  • Do not engage with anyone who you think is far-right before you arrive at the point of counter protest – including shouting slogans. You have no idea what is around the corner
  • Please identify and listen to the stewards on the day. They are managing the event – please follow instructions to leave when they are made, in the safest way possible
  • Bring a notepad and pen to keep notes of any issues and the shoulder number of police officers.
  • Write key numbers on your arm (preferably under a sleeve). Include: an emergency contact, the number of the Green & Black Cross Protest Support line (London:  07946 541511). If you get arrested it’s important to be able to get in touch with the people you need to – even if your phone is out of battery. It’s a good idea to write down a friend or family member’s number and keep it with you.
  • Leave in groups, do not linger.
  • If you go to a cafe, bar, or pub after the event, do not do so in the vicinity of the protest. This could leave you behind and possibly going to the same place as members of the far right who could abuse you
  • When you know you are safe, let the people you informed about your intentions that you are safe

This guidance is not about being meek. It is about being smart and being able to contribute to the campaign work in the short, medium, and long run. It is about being organised. Stay safe so we can grow stronger.

Map of location:

For more protest and security guidance see:

Practical protest tips – Liberty

Effective mass mobilisation for Anti-Fascists – antifascist network

Who are we:

Community Solidarity Stroud District exists to build community led solidarity in the Stroud district to oppose the hatred of minorities and oppressed people arising from false and harmful information.

Please also see the following statement from the Local Authority:

Statement from Gloucester City Council

Gloucester City Council has issued a statement to those who are planning to attend and has warned those taking part to not ‘incite division, fear, or hostility’.

The statement states: “The council is aware of planned protests scheduled to take place during the day on Saturday outside a hotel on the outskirts of the city, which is currently housing asylum seekers placed by the Home Office.

“The council recognises the right to peaceful protest, but strongly condemns any actions or rhetoric that incite division, fear, or hostility within our communities. Gloucester is proud of its long-standing commitment to being a welcoming and inclusive city, and we remain steadfast in our approach.”

Gloucester City Council leader, Jeremey Hilton (Lib Dem) said: “We will not tolerate intimidation or hate speech in our city.

“We understand that immigration and housing are complex issues that evoke strong feelings. However, we must ensure that public discourse remains respectful and rooted in facts. The safety and dignity of all Gloucester residents — including asylum seekers — is paramount. We will not tolerate intimidation or hate speech in our city.”

The council statement adds: “We are working closely with Gloucestershire Constabulary and our partners to ensure public safety throughout the planned demonstration.

STROUD FORMS A…


Inspired by the symbolic ‘red line’ protests around the world, on the 16th of August CSSD joined hundreds of others to form a “Red Line For Gaza” stretching the full length of Stroud High Street. The line was a powerful demonstration against the daily atrocities occurring in Gaza by the IDF, a call for an end to the breaking of international law by the Israeli government, and a demand the UK government halts its supply of hardware and training to the Israeli military. 


Photography by Deborah Roberts

Relevant links…

Amnesty International

United Nations

Oxfam

Red Line for Gaza

RED LINE FOR GAZA – SATURDAY AUGUST 16 11am – STROUD HIGH STREET

Join us on Saturday 16 August at 11am for the Red Line For Gaza – an action organised by the Stroud Ceasefire Now Coalition.

We will all gather at the top of Stroud High Street and assemble into a long line of people from the top to the bottom of the High Street.

WEAR RED.

We will be accompanied by the Stroud Red Band and a lone drummer will walk down the line, encouraging everyone to say in turn “This is my Red Line for Gaza”.

If you would like to say a reason for it being your Red Line, please do, for example “Starving children – this is my Red Line for Gaza”

The action will last for approximately 30 minutes after which everyone is invited to come down to Bank Gardens to gather and share thoughts about what this means for all of us.

Everyone is welcome, this is an inclusive event and hate speech will not be tolerated.

Meet at the top of the High Street at 11am for the event briefing and preparation

Join the campaign redlineforgaza.org.uk

Supporting organisations:
Community Solidarity Stroud District * Na'amod Gloucestershire * Nailsworth Quakers * Parents & Makers for Palestine * Parents for Future Stroud * Palestine Solidarity Campaign - Stroud District * Stroud Quakers * Stroud Against Racism * Stroud Red Band * Stroud Together with Refugees * The RYSE (together these organisations form the Stroud Ceasefire Now Coalition)

Nationally the Red Line for Gaza campaign is supported by Actionaig, All We Can, Amos Trust, Anti-Slavery, Choose Love, Christian Aid, Doctors of the World, Islamic Relief UK, Greenpeace, Humanity and Inclusion, Na'amod, Mothers' Manifesto, Oxfam, Quakers, and War Child

Agenda 2030: Debunking Myths, Engaging With Real Critiques.

Far-right conspiracy theorists have claimed that the UN’s Agenda 2030 for sustainable development is a secret plan for a new world order that will control all our lives. Here we briefly outline Agenda 2030, examine the far-right’s myths, and list some genuine critiques of Agenda 2030.

What IS Agenda 2030 Really?

Agenda 2030 is the UN’s voluntary, non‑binding plan for sustainable development, adopted by 193 nations in 2015. It sets out 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—from eradicating poverty to protecting ecosystems.

There is no enforcement mechanism. Each nation decides how, or if, to implement these goals.

How Did The Conspiracy Theory Begin?

  • 1992 – The UN adopted Agenda 21, a similarly voluntary framework.
  • John Birch Society – A far‑right anti‑communist group reframed Agenda 21 as a plot for world government, property seizures, and “eco‑totalitarianism.”
  • Alex Jones – Infowars integrated Birch narratives into a larger “New World Order” storyline, linking Agenda 2030 with the “Great Reset.”
  • UK spread – Figures like Sandi Adams adapted these ideas to British politics, attaching them to planning issues like 15‑minute cities and low‑traffic zones

Myths vs. Facts

MythFact
The UN will impose a one‑world government.Agenda 2030 is voluntary; the UN has no enforcement power.
Agenda 2030 abolishes private property.The SDGs promote secure land access and property rights.
15‑minute cities are a UN plot.15‑minute cities are local planning ideas, not UN mandates.
Agenda 2030 is about depopulation.The SDGs address healthcare, poverty, and equality; no population control measures exist.
Agenda 2030 removes national sovereignty.Nations retain full sovereignty; each defines its own approach.

Legitimate Critiques: The Real Conversations

While conspiracy theories distract from reality, serious critiques exist—and they’re important:

Technocracy & Democratic Deficit

Critics argue that the SDGs are top‑down and overly technical, with limited democratic debate. Civil society often has token participation.

Neoliberal Framing

Scholars note that the SDGs work within a neoliberal growth model, avoiding systemic change in global economic structures that cause inequality and environmental harm.

Overambition & Lack of Enforcement

169 targets spread across 17 goals are difficult to track and fund. With no binding mechanisms, countries can sign on for PR without real change—what some call “SDG‑washing.”

Growth vs. Sustainability

Economists question whether endless GDP growth can truly be reconciled with environmental limits, noting a lack of transformative policy on consumption and energy.


Why This Matters

Conspiracies like “Agenda 2030 is a world government plot” create fear and mistrust—but also serve to shield the SDGs from the legitimate critiques they deserve. If we move past disinformation, we can have better debates about:

  • Whether the SDGs challenge or uphold the economic status quo
  • How democratic the process really is
  • Whether we need alternative models (degrowth, post‑growth, or Buen Vivir)

In short: Agenda 2030 isn’t a UN plot to control your life—but it is a political project worth debating on real terms.

Related Links

https://fullfact.org/online/Agenda2030-cartoon-UN/

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/un-agenda-21-2030/

https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/fake-un-document-used-to-spread-false-new-world-order-goals/

https://www.wearewater.org/en/insights/who-is-afraid-of-the-2030-agenda/

Follow-up from our “Against the Fascist Creep” meeting

How to stop the Fascist Creep, Sunday 11th May 2025

Estimated 2 minute total read time

Summary of discussions

What struck you about what you heard, any reflections?

Below is a summary of group discussions onWhat can be done to help prevent fascist creep locally?”


Build Stronger, Inclusive Communities
  • Create community hubs, youth clubs, informal gathering spaces, and projects like community games.
  • Encourage cross-cultural dialogue, twinning programs (e.g. Somali Kitchen & local farms), and events that bridge divides.
  • Promote welcoming, inclusive environments that actively counter “othering”

Foster Conversations & Human Connection
  • Hold open, non-judgmental conversations—even with those you disagree with.
  • Use compassionate communication and deep listening practices.
  • Avoid shaming; instead, encourage dialogue with “far-right hesitant” individuals.
  • Host Q&As, debates, and storytelling events to humanize perspectives.

Better Communication & Storytelling
  • Create compelling narratives through positive storytelling, arts, and media (especially social media).
  • Use branding, creative messaging, and counter-narratives to challenge fascist framing.
  • Start local blogs, stalls, and community media to amplify local voices, e.g. amplifystroud.com
  • Share facts with clarity—use cribsheets, history-based messaging, and simple language.

Education & Awareness
  • Encourage critical thinking, media literacy, and awareness of propaganda (including algorithms, influencers like Andrew Tate).
  • Develop youth-led political education projects and outreach.
  • Address unconscious bias and promote understanding of fascism, history, and social impact.

Action, Activism & Civic Engagement
  • Get active: attend events, support anti-poverty services, and show up visibly (e.g. in streets, at councils).
  • Promote bystander training, accountability, and community resilience programs.
  • Campaign for electoral reform, engage with MPs, and challenge disinformation.
  • Support public services (like free transport, housing, healthcare) to reduce social precarity.

Creativity, Culture & Hope
  • Use art, comedy, and shared experiences to connect and uplift.
  • Promote hope and empathy as guiding principles.
  • Model the behaviour you want to see—compassion, courage, and kindness.

If you’re interested in exploring any of the above in collaboration with us, please contact us!

Share this post:

Follow-up from our Food, Farming and The Future meeting

Below are the references to Jade Bashford’s introduction, based on her decades of work in this area, and the text of Judith Large’s short talk.

If you’d be interested in being kept in the loop re what’s going on locally in Stroud District around food and growing, please get in touch and we can connect you.

decorative

UK food security

Book – Feeding Britain: Our Food Problems and How To Fix Them by Tim Lang (google books link)

Farming and biodiversity

Report – State of Nature 2019 UK Full Report (pdf link)

Webpage – “Organic farming is better for wildlife” (Soil Association website)

Co2emissions from food

Policy Brief “Why UK retailers’ climate commitments are failing to deliver and what can be done to fix it” (produced by Feedback – now known as Foodrise, “a charity transforming the food system for climate, nature and justice”)

Food poverty levels and demographics UK

Survey results “Food Insecurity Tracking” (compiled by The Food Foundation)

Diet related ill health and health inequality

Press Release: “New report reveals toll of diet-related illness on UK productivity” (issued by The Food Foundation)

Report: “Dietary Health Disparities Across Socio-economic Groups: A Data Story” (issued by The Food Foundation)

Food waste

Research library compiled by Foodrise

Land access and distribution

Book: “The Book of Trespass – Crossing the Lines that Divide Us

Finally, you may be interested to watch a recording from the Land Workers Alliance AGM earlier this year which had an agenda item on “exploring the connections between agroecology and anti-fascism” (see description and embedded video below).

“Over the past year we have seen a steep increase in the visibility of far right and fascist ideology in the UK- from the xenophobic and racist riots last summer, to a surge in support for anti-migrant parties like Reform. The food and farming world has been especially targeted by right wing ideologues, such as through the No Farmers NoFood campaign and protests. A lot of our members have been speaking out and mobilising against the right wing co-optation of landwork, rural communities and discourses around food sovereignty.

In this session we looked at the connections between agroecology and anti-fascism, deepening our understanding of how rightwing ideas creep into farming communities; and we explored how the LWA can take a stand against this.”

Who is hijacking fears about food and farming to recruit people to harmful ideas? [talk by Judith Large]

My thanks to the co-panelists for setting the scene so effectively.

Who is hijacking fears about food and farming to recruit people to harmful ideas?’ I have been asked to address this question and would like to do so in two ways; first by looking at well documented precedents, at Examples of the co-option of rural and farming concerns by populist/nationalist and ultimately fascist interests; and secondly by digging down into what is being said and promoted both in the public domain and in less visible social media from the far right to the wider farming community. Quite simply, when we see signs and merchandise saying ‘No Farmers No Food’ we do not always know what we are looking at.  My concern is the raising of awareness, such that we may be better equipped to build resilience and offer healthy alternatives for the future of farming. .

So first to a bit of history, the time would be 1929 to 1939 and beyond, and a key name is Walther Darre, (do remember this name as we’ll refer to it again in about five minutes) who was influential during this decade Germany for promoting the ideology of ‘Blut und Boden’ which means Blood and Soil where “blood” represents race and ancestry, while “soil” expresses the concepts of territory, land. The essence of the theory is a mutual and long-term relationship between a people and the land that they occupy and cultivate. It is critically important here to remember that Jews were prohibited for centuries from owning land in much of central Europe. For so-called ‘white Aryans’(as promoted by Hitler) racial purity was seen as rooted in the soil in an ancestral, almost mystical way – a belief which contributed both to Nazi race supremacy thinking and to the doctrine of Lebensraum,.or Room for Living which justified Nazi expansion into surrounding lands displacing and enslaving peoples like the Slavs. Farmers, in this case still regarded as peasants were elevated to a central position in the Reich propaganda, and Darre was promoted from senior SS command to Reich Minister for Agriculture. Please hold this thought-as we move forward.

For there is no doubting the importance of farmers to any society, to any state, and in light of low food prices,  the lifting of food subsidies or differences on climate policy they have flexed their muscle through tractor protests end mobilisation.  Furious Dutch farmers changed the course of national politics between 2019 and 2023 in opposition to potential changes in regulation on nitrogen emissions – at one point 2,200 tractors blocked Dutch roads in the largest congestion display ever seen in the country. The official Farmers’ party now sits in coalition with the right wing in the Netherlands government.    We have seen similar mass protests during the last year in France, Poland, Spain, Belgium and Hungary.  In each case there are country-specific grievances and leadership. But a militant group the Farmers Defence Force is receiving direct assistance from a Hungarian think tank under Victor Orban, the self styled authoritarian promoter of the EU’s first illiberal state.

And what of Farmers Protests here?  ‘No Farmers No Food’ is an effective slogan with a terrific offering of online branded merchandising.  The simplicity of the slogan will appeal to many who feel disgruntled or fed up with government policies or their own personal predicaments. It boasts a larger membership than the National Farmers Union and was founded by one James Melville, a public relations specialist.

James Melville also sits on the board of Together, which has run campaigns against Covid-19 lockdowns, the  Ultra Low Emission Zone in London and now Anti–Net Zero. Melville appeared with Russell Brand in an interview seemingly supporting the ‘Reset Theory’ (that a cabal of multinational interests designed/created Covid in order to collapse societies so that they could move in and take over through financial and digital means.

‘Resett’ is one of several conspiracy theories in play for the Far Right.  Another has been voiced recently by both Nigel Farage and Jeremy Clarkson. Last November,  speaking in front of around 50 tractors at Belmont Farm in North London, Farage suggested  that the Labour government had a “sinister agenda” to acquire “lots of land because they’re planning for another five million people to come into the country”.  Jeremy Clarkson writing in The Sun newspaper, that he was “convinced” that Labour had a “sinister plan” to “ethnically cleanse the countryside of farmers” to make room for “immigrants and net zero wind farms.” 

This claim echoes the “Great Replacement” conspiracy theory, which holds that progressive immigration policies are a mechanism to replace white people in the West, and has been cited by Donald Trump in recent months and derided by critics as white supremacist thinking.  Then we have climate change denial as voiced by Justin Rogers, who co-founded Farmers to Action. Rogers, has spread conspiracy theories across his social media accounts. He has claimed that “climate change is one of the biggest scams that has ever been told”, propagated by “our governments and their puppet masters.”   He claims that oil and gas are renewable, and that carbon dioxide cannot be dangerous because it “feeds plants”. 

Rogers claimed that farmers were facing an “existential threat” from “anti-farming policies” including “net zero, solar panels, rewilding”. And it gets worse. In a video on his social media, Rogers criticises “greedy governments and corporations,” and says “they really do like to get their shekels”, a reference to Israel’s currency. This claim repeats an anti-semitic trope accusing governments of being controlled by a shady Jewish cabal. 

And this brings us full circle, to the way the recognised neo-Nazi far right in this country are cultivating an interest in Farmers protests as well.  I refer to the group Patriotic Alternatives. And I would like to read two direct quotes from their website, the first from 2022:

“Farming in this country, as a whole, is a White man’s job. Most of the ethnicities that are available to be documented don’t even show up: just over 99% of farming in the UK is done by White people… Fields, food, animals, the countryside, the community: this is all important to us, this is a bastion of who we are that we cannot afford to surrender to the flood of globalists who want to corrupt it and destroy it…. Nationalists who are looking for a plot of land and finding the right area to start their own small farms could negotiate with others before going all-in to purchase a farm”

Overall, the Blood and Soil mantra remains popular among the British extreme right. An article on the PA website names Walther Darré as part of “a rich pedigree” of far-right environmentalist thought. Unsurprisingly, such ideologies are steeped in antisemitism and racism, with Jews and immigrant populations portrayed as cosmopolitan, rootless, urbanising people, devoid of respect for, or spiritual connection with, the land, and so posing an intrinsic threat to nature and rural traditions.

Once again rhetoric overlaps with the “White Genocide/Great Replacement” conspiracy theory, which alleges that sinister, often-Jewish elites are encouraging migration into the West as part of a plot to destroy the white race. An article on the PA website titled “Ecocide” takes aim at George Soros, a frequent target of anti-semitic conspiracy theory, and his “co-conspirators”:

Another article on the PA website titled “Ecocide” takes aim at George Soros, a frequent target of antisemitic conspiracy theory, and his “co-conspirators”:

“few have done more to damage both the ecological and human equilibrium that has sustained the planet for millennia. By means of their NGOs, they have ferried invasive species across the Mediterranean […] Actions that have culminated in national governments spending billions to cement over bucolic landscapes in their rush to build accommodation for the “New Europeans” and tarmac over ancient woodlands to provide them with roads to aid their rapid access to social security offices, mosques and community centres where they can congregate and displace the indigenous species.”

How important then to cultivate counter-narratives; to demonstrate inclusion, transitional thinking and both local and national relevance for farming and the future. I look forward tour discussions, and to learning a great deal from you all.

Don’t ban Palestine Action – solidarity statement

WE ARE ALL PALESTINE ACTION 

We demand that the government ends all diplomatic, economic and military support for Israel, and withdraw their threat to proscribe Palestine Action.

Read our statement >>>

This statement is one of solidarity, and one of intent. It is a response to the Labour government’s stated aim – made by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper – to “proscribe [ban] Palestine Action under section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000. A draft proscription order will be laid in Parliament on Monday 30 June. If passed, it will make it illegal to be a member of, or invite support for, Palestine Action”. This would mean those who “join” or express support for Palestine Action could face sentences of up to 14 years in prison. 

Palestine Action is “a direct action movement committed to ending global participation in Israel’s genocidal and apartheid regime”. We believe their actions have been proportionate – and effective – and that they have public support.

We demand that the government ends all diplomatic, economic and military support for Israel, and withdraw their threat to proscribe Palestine Action.

In 2004, current Prime Minister Keir Starmer defended a man who broke into the nearby RAF Fairford base (which hosts US bombers) and attempted to set fire to military aircraft. This was part of a trial of five people who had broken into the military air base in 2003 and disabled equipment in order to disrupt military operations at the start of the Iraq War. Starmer argued in Court that the activists’ actions were justified because they were to stop an ‘illegal war.’ As in similar cases in which Palestine Action activists have faced jury trials, two of the defendants were acquitted in May 2007 after the jury accepted their actions were reasonable for trying to prevent war crimes. Palestine Action now faces proscription for the same protest action which Starmer had defended as legal – this time using only paint, not fire. 

If the government goes ahead with their plans to proscribe Palestine Action, we signal our intention to make the proscription unworkable – to defy it, to encourage others to do so, and to assist people in taking actions similar to those taken by Palestine Action.

It is necessary to directly disrupt the production of weapons used in the genocide in Gaza and in the illegal occupation and apartheid conducted by the Israeli state, and to protest the companies and institutions complicit in this.

We know that not everyone who reads our statement will know who Palestine Action are, and may not support their actions. We don’t agree with everything people involved with the group have ever said or done. Crucially, we don’t think criminal damage or encouraging it with the aim of preventing killing should be prosecuted as terrorism.

We ask you to read more on our website (below), and consider the implications of defining these actions – even if you don’t agree with them – as “terrorism” very carefully. If you agree with our statement, we encourage you to take action, alongside us and many others:

What can you do?

Additional information:

To accompany our statement on Palestine Action we provide these additional notes to address the following questions:

  • Why is Community Solidarity Stroud District making a statement of solidarity?
  • How Israel is breaking International Law
  • What is Palestine Action?
  • Why did Palestine Action target RAF Brize Norton?
  • Is action by Palestine Action effective?
  • Is there public support for Palestine Action’s cause?
  • But isn’t what Palestine Action do fairly described as terrorism?
  • Isn’t Palestine Action antisemitic?
  • How can I get more information from Community Solidarity Stroud District?

Why is Community Solidarity Stroud District making a statement of solidarity?

We are making this statement because solidarity with other activist groups is important – we will not allow the government to single out a protest group in this way. We are making this statement alongside dozens of other organisations. This is necessary to show how farcical it is for Yvette Cooper to say that banning Palestine Action “does not affect lawful protest groups and other organisations campaigning on issues around Palestine or the Middle East”. We want the government to understand that if they “make it illegal to be a member of, or invite support for, Palestine Action”, they will be targeting us, as well as Palestine Action.

We are making this statement because the decision does not come in isolation – it continues a creeping authoritarianism and restriction of the right to protest. Some hoped that the new government elected in May 2024 would reverse or at least halt this trend, but the government is pursuing further restrictions that mean “the UK is moving out of line with other democratic states and closer into step with Russia and China”, according to experts. More than 20 legal organisations from around the world had already condemned “credible reports of serious violations of fair trial rights and other human rights of Palestine Action activists” and “called on the British authorities to “urgently cease the misuse of anti-terrorism legislation against the Filton 18” – 18 people imprisoned since August 2024 accused of “terrorism-connected” offences for action at the Filton, Bristol premises of Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest weapons company.

As Liberty say: “This a concerning escalation of how the Government treats protest groups and uses terrorism powers. Proscribing a direct-action protest group in this way potentially sets a new precedent for what we do and do not treat as terrorism.

“We’re worried about the chilling effect this would have on the thousands of people who campaign for Palestine, and their ability to express themselves and take part in protests. Proscribing Palestine Action would mean that showing support for them in any way – for example, sharing a post on social media or wearing a logo – could carry a prison sentence.

“MPs must strongly consider the necessity and proportionality of this move by the Home Secretary when they debate the matter in Parliament – as well as the precedent this worrying expansion of terrorism powers would set for our democracy.”

We are making this statement in the spirit of our core mission to oppose the hatred of minorities and oppressed people. The Palestinian people are an oppressed people – experiencing apartheid and occupation and – right now –  a genocide; a “war of annihilation” waged against them by Israel (in the words of activists from the Israel-based organisation Standing Together);.

Finally, we are making this statement as a community group that values the power individuals and community groups have to shape the world. We believe politics is about more than elections, that protest is about more than placards. In explaining their approach, Palestine Action say “Rather than begging those who are complicit to gain a moral compass, we go straight to the source and shut down the production of Israeli weapons.” We believe taking action in this way can be proportionate, effective, and have broad public support – as in this case.

The actions Palestine Action takes are proportionate – their intention is to prevent killing, the destruction of property, and complicity in apartheid, occupation and genocide (see our section below on how Israel is breaking International Law).

The actions Palestine Action takes are regularly effective. In their words “Palestine Action has forced Israeli weapons factories to permanently close down, companies to cut ties with Elbit [Israel’s biggest weapons producer] and lost Elbit lucrative contracts worth £billions”

The cause of Palestine Action has public support. Juries have found individuals who have taken action on behalf of the group “not guilty” in several cases, having heard arguments that the actions were necessary to protect lives and property in Palestine.

The UK government is an active participant in the genocide in Palestine. It is supplying weapons – “The UK government approved $169m worth of military equipment to Israel in the three months that followed the Labour government’s partial suspension of arms exports over concerns they could be used unlawfully in Gaza”. The UK government is also collaborating with the Israeli military – through cargo transports, refueling, and ongoing training

How Israel is breaking International Law

The actions of the Israeli government in Gaza and in the West Bank have been widely condemned, including as unlawful. On 19 July 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) “declared that Israel’s occupation of the Gaza strip and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, is unlawful, along with the associated settlement regime, annexation and use of natural resources. The Court added that Israel’s legislation and measures violate the international prohibition on racial segregation and apartheid. The ICJ mandated Israel to end its occupation, dismantle its settlements, provide full reparations to Palestinian victims and facilitate the return of displaced people.” On the 21 November 2024, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, holding him “Allegedly responsible for the war crimes of starvation as a method of warfare and of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts from at least 8 October 2023 until at least 20 May 2024.”

Historians of the Holocaust and experts in genocide studies, such as Prof. Daniel Blatman and Prof. Amos Goldberg, describe what is happening as “a clear picture of genocide.”

Even the UK Government’s formal position on Gaza and the West Bank acknowledges that the occupation of these territories and Israeli settlements within them are illegal: “The UK has a clear position on Israeli settlements: The West Bank, including East Jerusalem, Gaza and the Golan Heights have been occupied by Israel since 1967. Settlements are illegal under international law, constitute an obstacle to peace and threaten a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. We will not recognise any changes to the pre-1967 borders, including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties.” 

We are a founder member of the Stroud Ceasefire Now Coalition because of these realities. This involves us attending weekly vigils, and sharing information about events organised by partner organisations in the coalition with our supporter audience of around 800 people.

What is Palestine Action?

In their own words, “Palestine Action is a direct action movement committed to ending global participation in Israel’s genocidal and apartheid regime. Using disruptive tactics, Palestine Action targets corporate enablers of the Israeli military-industrial complex and seeks to make it impossible for these companies to profit from the oppression of Palestinians.”

Why did Palestine Action target RAF Brize Norton?

Flights leave daily for RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, a base used for military operations in Gaza and across the Middle East. The base is used for UK and US military cargo transports to the Israeli military, and for surveillance missions flown by the RAF in support of Israel’s genocide in Gaza. The planes targeted were Airbus Voyagers, which can carry military cargo and have used to refuel Israeli/US/UK military aircrafts and fighter jets

Is action by Palestine Action effective?

Palestine Action say over a dozen companies have cut ties with Elbit, Israel’s largest weapon’s manufacturer, as a result of their actions to date. Here are some examples:

  • The sole recruiters for the British operations of Israel’s largest weapons company, Elbit Systems, ended their association with Elbit after 2 months of activism by Palestine Action in November 2023. 
  • “property managers for Elbit Systems’ Shenstone drone factory, Fisher German… cut ties with the Israeli arms manufacturer” in December 2023.
  • A machinery supplier took steps “as a direct result of [Palestine Action’s] targeted actions” to ensure they are no longer associated with Elbit Systems”, prompted by “activists abseiling inside Hydrafeed to dismantle their equipment, smashing through the front doors and spraying their premises in blood red paint”.
  • Metal casting manufacturer Dean Group International “severed all ties with Elbit Systems UK subsidiary Instro Precision, and has promised never to work with Elbit Systems or its subsidiaries in the future”, less than three weeks after Dean Group was targeted by Palestine Action in a direct action campaign (in April 2025).

Is there public support for Palestine Action’s cause?

Recent polling (Opinium Research between 30 May and 2 June) showed “57 percent of people think the UK should impose a full arms embargo, with only 13 percent opposed. The poll also found 53 percent of people think Israel should be expelled from the United Nations, while 50 percent said Israeli products in supermarkets should be boycotted.”

YouGov polling in May 2025 found 41% of GB adults thought the UK should be “More critical towards Israel than it has been”, and in January 2025, 79% of GB adults supported a ceasefire and only 4% opposed one.

This polling is consistent with earlier polling – in May 2024 “55% of people support[ed] the UK ending the sale of arms to Israel for the duration of the conflict in Gaza. Only 13% want[ed] to see the continuation of arms sales”. At that time “73% of people support[ed] an immediate ceasefire in Gaza… Only 8% believe[d] that there should not be one”. At that time “Only 18% of people polled approve of the [then Conservative] UK Government’s response, while even fewer, just 12%, approve of the response from Labour.”

While there is not polling indicating public attitudes to the disruptive action taken by Palestine Action, juries have found people not guilty when they have used arguments arguing the damage they have caused is justified by seeking to reduce killing and the destruction of property:

  • “On Thursday 5th October 2023, a jury unanimously found an activist from Palestine Action, Sohail Sultan, not guilty of criminal damage against Arconic… Arconic manufactures components and materials for Boeing Apache Helicopters and Lockheed Martin F-35 Fighter Jets. Both of these are routinely deployed by the Israeli military in aerial assaults on Gaza, including in the May 2021 bombardments which killed 230 Palestinians including 65 children”. A “not guilty verdict was reached after the jury deliberated on whether or not Sohail’s action was taken to immediately protect property in Palestine and in necessity to save lives.”
  • In December 2023, “eight Palestine Action activists who used direct action to shut down the Israeli weapons trade [were] acquitted of a total 12 charges which included criminal damage, burglary and encouraging criminal damage”. All eight had pled “not guilty to all charges on the basis that Elbit and Israel are the guilty party, not Palestine Action”, following occupation of three Elbit Systems drone/weapon factories, their London offices, and the offices of their landlords, Jones Lang LaSalle.
  • In May 2024, “Two activists from Palestine Action were unanimously acquitted of criminal damage by a jury in Leicester Crown Court”, having argued “the action taken was necessary in order to save lives and prevent the greater property damage in Palestine”. They had occupied the roof of UAV Tactical Systems, an Elbit drone factory in Leicester, “spray painted messages including “Shut Elbit Down” and “Free Palestine”, damaged a skylight to reveal a military drone inside and sprayed the building in blood red paint”.

But isn’t what Palestine Action do fairly described as terrorism?

In the context of the harm caused by Israel, this argument can seem preposterous, but it is a question worth answering.

Firstly it is worth noting that, in 2023, then Policing Minister Chris Philp stated that “Palestine Action does not meet the threshold for proscription as they do not commit, participate in, prepare for, promote, encourage, or otherwise be concerned with acts of terrorism.”

The definition of terrorism in the Terrorism Act is very broad, and in 2014 the senior lawyer tasked with reviewing the government’s terrorism legislation argued it had “begun to catch people it never really intended to catch”. The word is often selectively applied in ways that reflect an institutionalist Islamophobia or anti-Palestinian racism. “Prevent makes Muslim children unsafe. It renders schools sites of criminalisation and teachers informants in our classrooms… the intrinsic Islamophobia is no accidental byproduct: it is by design”. 

In the past, destruction of weaponry has been treated as criminal damage – legal sanctions already exist without escalating consequences to the level of “terrorism”. And – crucially – juries have also acquitted people who have taken part in such activity in the past. In addition to the Palestine Action cases mentioned above, and the 2003 RAF Fairford example mentioned in our statement:

  • In 1996 four women disarmed an RAF jet bound for Indonesia with hammers, causing £1.5 million in damage – their argued they were preventing British complicity in East Timor genocide – a jury found them not guilty.
  • In 2017 two activists attempted to disarm Typhoon jets allegedly bound for Saudi Arabia. They were acquitted using a defence of acting in the greater good – trying to stop the UK government’s complicity in the destruction of Yemen

As Greenpeace UK’s co-executive director, Areeba Hamid, says: “Proscribing Palestine Action would be a grave mistake. Unlike al-Qaida, Wagner group and the other groups classed as ‘terrorist organisations’, Palestine Action does not advocate for violent armed action or for people to be harmed. They exist to decommission the weapons used to commit war crimes. Proscribing them would mark a dark turn for our democracy and a new low for a government already intent on stamping out the right to protest. The police already have laws to prosecute any individuals found guilty of a crime. And as a non-violent organisation with ‘peace’ in our name, we would never defend violence. But outlawing an entire organisation and all of its supporters would be a dangerous step.”

Isn’t Palestine Action antisemitic?

The Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) have claimed their dossier and demands for proscription have motivated Yvette Cooper. They argue “Palestine Action is at the vanguard of an activist movement that is severely disrupting the lives of British Jews” and that the group has “vandalised Jewish premises with impunity”. Neither of these claims bears any scrutiny. 

The “Jewish premises” vandalised was the London-based landlords of ‘Discovery Park’ business park which Elbit’s Instro Precision weapons factory is situated in. Palestine Action said of the action: “Palestine Action’s direct action campaign involves targeting all those who facilitate, enable and profit from the operations of Israel’s biggest weapons producer. This includes landlords, recruiters, investors, suppliers, lobby firms, logistics firms and more. As a result, over a dozen companies have cut ties with Elbit to date. […] Instro Precision is a weapons maker owned by Elbit Systems, Israel’s biggest weapons producer. The factory, which produces targeting gear for the Israeli military to commit genocide, is based in and leased by Discovery Park Ltd.”

The business was not targeted because its owners were Jewish, as is evident from the targeting of many businesses which are not Jewish owned, but which similarly have involvement with Elbit.

There has been a very concerning rise in antisemitism in recent years, and supporters of CSSD will know we have done what we can to challenge this locally (including on occasion with reference to work by the CAA). However, it is inaccurate to say that the Palestine Solidarity movement broadly or Palestine Action specifically are “severely disrupting the lives of British Jews” – this is a moral panic, and one that has an ugly taste in the context of a rise in other forms of racism including anti-Palestinian racism and Islamophobia, not to mention the genuinely “severe disruption” of Palestinian lives. Our anti-racism should be consistent – throwing baseless accusations of antisemitism as a strategy to undermine Palestine solidarity is entirely counterproductive to efforts to tackle and eliminate antisemitism.

Jewish people as individuals and organised in groups hold a variety of positions on Israel and Palestine. Many Jewish people feel affinity with Israel, and/or have family and friends who live there. Regrettably, some Jewish organisations who have strong ties to Israel seek to excuse or justify the recent actions of the Israeli government, and/or support Israeli policies that break international law, or far-right members of the Israeli government who express open hatred and genocidal intent. However, other Jewish groups oppose these positions, and campaign in solidarity with Palestinians. One example is Na’amod – a movement of Jews in the UK seeking to end the Jewish community’s support for Israel’s occupation and apartheid, and to mobilise it in the struggle for freedom, equality and justice for all Palestinians and Israelis. Several of the Jewish members of CSSD are also members of a recently formed local branch of this organisation: Na’amod Gloucestershire.

Na’amod UK says: “Plans to proscribe Palestine Action signal an alarming escalation of the UK government’s repression of our democratic rights. Branding the group a ‘terrorist organisation’ would render support for the group and its nonviolent tactics a criminal offence, with penalties of up to 14 years’ imprisonment. The UK still provides military support to Israel as it massacres Palestinians daily. It is an indictment that rather than uphold its legal obligations to stop arming genocide, our government criminalises nonviolent action to disrupt it. We stand in solidarity with Palestine Action & against this attack on our freedoms.”

Nonetheless, it is worth adding some advice. There is evidence that the British government’s approach to Israel and to Palestine Action is influenced by lobbying. Referring to the factual details of this is obviously not antisemitic. But going beyond this to imply that this represents a foreign state or ‘Jewish conspiracy’ “pulling the strings” in Britain is worth avoiding. It’s not the case that either Israel, Zionists, or Jews run our government – rather, the British state has a long history of imperialism, colonialism, and applying the lessons learned repressing anti-colonial movements abroad here in Britain. After the British state’s actions in Iraq (to say nothing of the more distant past), the government’s current approach to Israel should not surprise us – it is sadly a far from unique example of involvement in violence, dispossession, and enshrining inequality in law. Yet, people living in Britain and in former (and current!) colonies have regularly forced the British state to retreat, and we hope this can be the case on this occasion.

How can I get more information from Community Solidarity Stroud District?

Food, Farming & The Future, advert for public meeting – 25th May 2025

decorative

Food, Farming and the Future

An open meeting hosted by Community Solidarity Stroud District

Sunday 25th May, 4-6pm, Trinity Rooms, Field Road, Stroud GL5 2HZ

decorative

Join us for an inspiring meeting learning from people involved in positive and practical projects around food and farming locally. We’ll explore people’s concerns about corporate control of the food system, the future of farming, and how concerns about food and farming are being hijacked to recruit people to harmful ideas.

Our speakers will discuss the following questions:

  • What can we do about food poverty? Many people cannot access enough/healthy food
  • Why are small farms struggling and failing? What will the impact of recent policy changes such as inheritance tax be?
  • What is working in farming like? How can working conditions in the UK and overseas be improved? How can we increase access to land for farming?
  • Will there be enough food for everyone in the future? How will climate change affect food security?
  • What is the impact of farming on biodiversity, the environment, and climate change, and how can we produce food more sustainably?
  • How can we challenge the power of supermarkets and other corporations?
  • Who is hijacking fears about food and farming – stoking fear and attempting to recruit people to harmful ideas?
  • What can we do about all this?!

Agenda:

  • 4pm – event opens, time for settling and meeting people
  • 4.10pm – Introduction by the Chair
  • 4.20-5pm – Talks by our panel of speakers
  • 4-5.30pm – Discussion in groups
  • 5.30-5.45pm – Wrap up
  • 5.45pm – Closing remarks by Chair and time to chat
  • 6.00pm – Event ends

Chair and speakers:

Jade Bashford will chair the meeting. Jade is the Programme Manager for Ready Healthy Eat at the Real Farming Trust. She has previously worked on sustainable food projects for some years at a grass roots, national and international level. She was employed by the Soil Association for 14 years, in the Local Food Department. She has worked on Community Supported Agriculture (CSA), set up a food hub and community orchards and has been the owner/director of an organic brewery and canteen. She has a smallholding in Stroud and keeps bees.

We will also be joined by Judith Large representing CSSD, Molly Scott Cato – local Green Party politician, economist and activist, and Eric – a farmer running Good Small Farms in Stroud.

Summary and social share buttons:

Please join us for this public meeting on Sunday 25th May from 4pm to 6pm at the Trinity Rooms, Field Road, Stroud GL5 2HZ. Please come along.

Stop the Fascist Creep, advert for public meeting – 11th May 2025

STOP the FASCIST CREEP - An open event exploring how Stroud can resist the rise of the far right. Sunday 11th May from 2 pm to 4 pm at the Trinity Rooms, Field Road, Stroud GL5 2HZ

Community Solidarity Stroud District was formed 3 years ago by people who were concerned and alarmed that disinformation and racism were being spread in our town by groups and individuals aligned to the far right distributing The Light paper.

Disinformation is in the mainstream and the far right is organising and gaining strength. We can see this in the USA under Trump where disinformation is spread by the whole Cabinet, Germany with the AFD, The National Rally in France and in the rise of parties supporting racists like Steven Yaxley-Lennon and Nigel Farage in the UK.

Fuelled by the owners of social media sites, such as Elon Musk, it is using disinformation and infiltration to take advantage of people’s anger over falling living standards and inequality to divide our communities. Whilst those who spread the far right agenda claim that they are defending free speech and ‘truth’, they use every opportunity to assault it by spreading false information and promoting transphobia, Islamophobia, antisemitism, homophobia, climate change denial, Holocaust denial, and support for attacks on refugees and women’s rights.

  • How do you feel about the rise of the far right?
  • What do we value that we may lose?
  • How do we stop the fascist creep in Stroud?

Community Solidarity Stroud District is hosting an open event on Sunday 11th May from 2pm to 4pm at the Trinity Rooms, Field Road, Stroud GL5 2HZ where we can come together to discuss what more Stroud can do. Please come along.

We are offering a space for supervision of children (any age) so that people with caring responsibilities can engage with the event. And also, where appropriate, so we can facilitate and support children to engage themselves with the content of the event. There will be pens and paper, toys and games. Tosca who will be running the space has an Enhanced DBS and works with young people in Stroud.

Agenda:

  • 14.00 – 14.15: Welcome and introduction
  • 14.15 – 14.20: Groups- Ground rules
  • 14.20-14.30: Introductions in groups
  • 14.30 – 15.30: Core discussion 20 minutes per question.
    • How do you feel about the rise of the far right?
    • What do you value that we may lose?
    • How do we stop the fascist creep in Stroud?
  • 15.30 – 15.45: Group reflections and feed back
  • 15.45 – 16.00: Closing, next steps, and thank you.